This blog dives into what an all-payer model agreement is and if we should expect to see more states incorporate this model in the future.
What is an all-payer model agreement?
An all-payer model agreement is a system where a service or treatment costs the same for every patient under the same provider, no matter what insurance coverage the patient might hold. This means that, for this type of model, “all payers” pertains to private health insurance plans, large employer self-insured plans, uninsured patients and Medicaid and Medicare plans (under an approved waiver).
According to the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), payment rates "may be set per service or per case (e.g., hospital care for a heart attack). Rate setting has mainly been used for hospital inpatient and outpatient services."
Maryland's all-payer model
Maryland, the poster child for the all-payer model since 2014, has rates for services or treatments that can be set by a state authority or by providers. Maryland’s all-payer model is primarily for hospital services, and is the only state with a hospital finance all-payer system.
According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Maryland’s aim is to reduce the all-site hospital readmissions rate; reduce 65 preventable hospital-acquired conditions, also known as Potentially Preventable Complications (PPCs); and measure population health through various population health measures.
From 2014–2018, CMS conducted research into the efficacy of the all-payer model in Maryland known as the performance period.
The findings, taken directly from CMS, give a look at what happened during the performance period and include the following:
Overall, the performance period saw some positive findings, but not many significant changes. This project has been going on for years, so it’s safe to assume that this model will continue but likely to shift and change to provide more substantial results (e.g., Vermont's all-payer ACO model). We do not currently know how Maryland's model versus any other model will fare, considering the growing transparency legislation (e.g., the federal No Surprises Act).
Both Vermont and Colorado have also adopted all-payer models.
Vermont's all-payer ACO model
CMS is using Vermont's All-payer Accountable Care Organization (ACO) Model as a new test of an alternative payment model. In this model, the most significant payers throughout the state (i.e., Medicare, Medicaid and commercial payers) focus on health outcomes by incentivizing value and quality.
Participation is voluntary for providers and other payers. This is considered a type of value-based care program and more info can be found on the Quality Payment Program website.
Vermont's All-payer ACO Model began in 2017 and is scheduled to conclude at the end of 2022. CMS will hopefully publish findings in early to middle 2023.
Colorado's Alternative Payment Model (APM)
Colorado is moving away from the fee-for-service model and aims for a value-based care model.
As value-based care is continually tested as a strong alternative to the typical fee-for-service model, we can expect to see growing changes made in states throughout the American healthcare system. For more information about value-based care, see our blog "Defining Value-based Care."
Rivet offers software solutions that integrate with your EHR for up-front patient cost estimates (that comply with the 2021 No Surprises Act), as well as denied and underpaid claim solutions.
To see a quick one-page synopsis of how our estimates comply with the Good Faith Estimate, click the button below for a free PDF.
To see Rivet's Estimates and discuss billing pain points, request a demo below.